• All Products
  • XN4
      • Overview
      • • Maximum Wi-Fi Bandwidth: 1.2Gbps
      • • Maximum Wi-Fi Users: 256
      • • Typical Wi-Fi Coverage: 75,000sqft
      • • Integrated Access Points: 4
      • • Integrated Wi-Fi Controller
      • • Integrated Wi-Fi Threat Sensor





  • XN8
      • Overview
      • • Maximum Wi-Fi Bandwidth: 2.4Gbps
      • • Maximum Wi-Fi Users: 512
      • • Typical Wi-Fi Coverage: 125,000sqft
      • • Integrated Access Points: 8
      • • Integrated Wi-Fi Controller
      • • Integrated Wi-Fi Threat Sensor





  • XN12
      • Overview
      • • Maximum Wi-Fi Bandwidth: 3.6Gbps
      • • Maximum Wi-Fi Users: 768
      • • Typical Wi-Fi Coverage: 125,000sqft
      • • Integrated Access Points: 12
      • • Integrated Wi-Fi Controller
      • • Integrated Wi-Fi Threat Sensor





  • XN16
      • Overview
      • • Maximum Wi-Fi Bandwidth: 4.8Gbps
      • • Maximum Wi-Fi Users: 1,024
      • • Typical Wi-Fi Coverage: 125,000sqft
      • • Integrated Access Points: 16
      • • Integrated Wi-Fi Controller
      • • Integrated Wi-Fi Threat Sensor





  • XMS
      • Overview
      • • Central management of the entire Wi-Fi Array network
      • • Continual monitoring of Wi-Fi network status and
        performance
      • • Multi-sector Antenna System
      • Value Added
      • • Track and analyze Wi-Fi network usage and growth over time
      • • Automatic alerting of network issues with drill down
        troubleshooting
      • • Fast and simple roll out of Wi-Fi network configuration
        changes

  • ACC


  Home > Best Practices - Distributed vs. Centralized


Best Practices - Distributed vs. Centralized


The majority of Wi-Fi networks being deployed today utilize a centralized architecture consisting of numerous thin (dumb) access points tied to controllers (WLAN Switch) in central closet. This legacy approach will exhibit significant performance issues with the advent of 802.11n, which will bring a 5X increase in Wi-Fi network traffic.

Consider the following when deciding between a distributed or centralized architecture:

DistributedCentralizedAdvantage Defined
Packet FlowEfficientInefficientCentralized architectures force all traffic to transit to a controller in the core, increasing core network congestion. Distributed architectures forward traffic directly to its final destination.
Latency/JitterLow HighCentralized traffic must first traverse the network to the controller and then undergo processing (QoS, tagging, encryption, etc). This additional routing results in increased congestion, latency, and jitter.
Access Point Capacity3.6Gbps300MbpsCentralized architectures typically offer 1 or 2 radios per access point, limiting the Wi-Fi capacity in a given area. Distributed architectures integrate up to 16 radios providing far greater capacity.
DeploymentSimpleComplexCentralized architectures require significant number of APs, antenna, cable and controllers deployments that increase complexity and install time. Distributed architectures integrate components to reduce cabling, simplify installs and reduce costs.
IntelligenceEfficientInefficientCentralized architectures place intelligence (QoS, security, tagging, etc) in the controller where all traffic is processed. Distributed architectures place intelligence at the edge, like wired networks, improves traffic handling and increase performance.
ReliabilityResilientProblematicWith centralized architectures loss of a single AP has little impact; however loss of a controller can mean loss of the entire Wi-Fi network. Distributed architectures integrate intelligence throughout the network, eliminating single points of failures.
ScalabilityIncrementalCostlyEach new AP added to a Central controller adds to the processing burden of the controller which slows performance for all APs to a point where additional controllers ($$) are required. Distributed architectures easily scale as additional processing capability is added with each new wireless access device.



Xirrus Corporate Xirrus U.K. Xirrus Australia Xirrus Federal